#10

Bank Atlantic Center – Florida Panthers


Convenience/Access – Get in your car and drive to Sunrise for the treat of watching the Cats. Apparently only the Heat are worthy of Miami proper.


Location/Scene – There is clearly no room on South Beach, but somewhere a bit more connected to the nightlife and social scene down here would undoubtedly help. There is no scene that we saw in Sunrise, besides at the tiki/margarita bar that we ate at a few hundred yards from the parking lot. There are probably some good reasons to have the rink out here, more central to other areas than all the way south, but these are our rankings and we like rinks in cities.

Outside Appearance – Chock up another newish, glass and white concrete structure to the NHL landscape. Nice, but nothing otherworldly. Some funky Miami art deco architecture would have been cool.


Inner Aesthetics – More blandness. It isn’t bad, but it isn’t memorable or good. The seats are green, which is nothing if not different. The scoreboard and outer LED boards are on the hard to read side.

Concourse - Best feature of the arena, by far. One of the higher scores in any given category of any rink, actually. The inside of this place is clean, interesting, unique, and screams Miami. Among the highlights: CARPETING, curtains, salsa dancers, lots of neon. Our game was actually the highest-attended game in Panthers history, and the concourses were not suffocating.

Sightlines – Good. Our club level seats were excellent and while there are steeper setups, this place certainly affords pretty good views. To our discredit, we did not check out the upper level sets in any detail.

Concessions – Like all good newer rinks, you can get anything you want here. We don’t recall anything amazing us or jumping out as especially interesting, but the lines weren’t long and there were plenty of stands.

Fans/Atmosphere – We got a sweet game- Montreal and all of their snowbird fans in town on the day before New Years’ Eve. Made for a crowd vibe but we really cant give any credit here, because we all know that the usual scene is way worse, and even with the charged crowd, the overall atmosphere was bland anyway. The continued “tradition” of the “Panthers….Goal” fan response is cool.

History/Banners – The few actual accomplishment-related banners were fine. There were the obligatory, cheap and unnecessary banners of all 30 nhl teams, but there wasn’t any #1 fan or such nonsense. A push, we say.

Cool Stuff – For a team with very little history, the panthers acknowledge and display their tradition well. Lots of homages to the 96 team, rat displays, etc. The large banners proclaiming the various skill-sets of current panthers (our favorite: Mike Van Ryn – KNOWLEDGE, is above) were a riot.

Bars – At least 2 big, non-generic bars on the main level- one of which was a cool vodka/ice bar type thing. We partook.


Store – Great selection, albeit light on jerseys and player shirts that we noticed. High prices.

Value – Very good, at least for the club seats. This team needs cheap tickets.

Overall – A really clean and attractive arena with a very bland seating bowl and no atmosphere in or around the rink to speak of. Another rink whose ranking is influenced heavily by one “outlier” ranking (EP’s).

USA disappoints in WJC...again.

It’s the holidays, so here’s my analysis of USA Hockey’s latest flop at the World Junior Championship.

First off, let me state that I realize it's weird that my allegiance to my pro team (the New York Rangers) is equal to my allegiance to my country’s teams in the sport I love. This is common in other countries but not so much here.

So, much to my chagrin, the US finished fifth this year. Just about their customary spot. Since winning their first WJC gold medal in 2004, the US has snagged one lonely bronze. It is completely unacceptable to have nothing to show for the last five tournaments except one bronze medal. It’s beyond a shame.

Now, I can’t get in the heads of the kids who’ve suited up for us in recent years, nor can I get in the heads of the coaches, but it just seems to me that no one cares about this tournament. This blows my mind. When they see the excitement it generates in Canada, how can they not have a burning desire to win the thing? How can they not want to rain on Canada’s parade? Many of these kids are junior or college teammates or have been with some of the Canadian players. How can they not have a strong desire to beat them? Have they no pride? Russia loses their semifinal to Canada and Nikita Filatov looks like he wants to jump off a bridge. The Canadians would have been in tears if they had lost on home ice. I don’t recall any Americans taking any of these bad showings over the last five years to heart.

If we were choosing teams from a shallow talent pool, or if we were simply without the talent to compete, I might be able to understand the apathy shown toward this event. Even though we don’t have Canada's depth of talent, our top players equal theirs.

I’m not suggesting President-elect Obama call together a summit on the state of American hockey like Canadians might ask of their leaders after results like these, but USA Hockey needs a complete overhaul. The leadership is rotten and crooked. But, the same old problem persists: no one notices. No one cares.

There are rinks in Texas, Florida, California, Georgia, and other warm weather states. This is viewed as great progress for our game in this country, and it is. I just think the game would be better off if those same rinks could display posters of players like James vanRiemsdyk and Colin Wilson wearing gold medals around their necks. A kid in Atlanta who learns of us winning a tournament might think it is worthwhile to play hockey over another sport.

We have made some progress. We’ve done well in the World Under 18 Championships. There are far fewer foreigners on American college rosters than ever before. I don’t say that because I don’t want Canadians or Europeans coming to our schools. I just think it’s awesome that there are enough Americans to fill most of our rosters. Ten or twenty years ago, the Canadian major junior castoff or academic-minded player who was starting to think about playing in the NCAA didn’t have to worry about a player from Texas or California taking his spot. Now he does and I think that’s great. But somehow we fail so spectacularly in the most prestigious tournament for young players.

Some things to consider:

World Junior Championship medals since 2005

Canada – 5 (5 gold)
Russia - 5 (3 silver, 2 bronze)
Sweden – 2 (2 silver)
Czech Republic – 1 (1 bronze)
Finland – 1 (1 bronze)
United States – 1 (1 bronze)

First round NHL draft picks who’ve played in WJC since 2005

Canada – 47
Unites States – 30
Czech Republic – 9
Russia – 7
Sweden – 7
Slovakia – 4
Denmark – 2
Belarus – 1
Switzerland - 1

A little intense, but here’s the entire list of those players. I had to put it together to arrive at those numbers, so why not look at it?

Canada - 47

2003
Braydon Coburn, 8th
Dion Phaneuf, 9th
Jeff Carter, 11th
Brent Seabrook, 14th
Ryan Getzlaf, 19th
Mike Richards, 24th
Anthony Stewart, 25th
Corey Perry, 28th
Shawn Belle, 30th

2004
Cam Barker, 3rd
Andrew Ladd, 4th
Devan Dubnyk, 14th
Kyle Chipchura, 18th

2005
Sidney Crosby, 1st
Benoit Pouliot, 4th
Carey Price, 5th
Luc Bourdon, 10th
Marc Staal, 12th
Sasha Pokulok, 14th
Ryan O’Marra, 15th
Ryan Parent, 18th
Kenndal McArdle, 20th
Andrew Cogliano, 25th
Steve Downie, 29th

2006
Jonathan Toews, 3rd
Jonathan Bernier, 11th
Bryan Little, 12th
Claude Giroux, 22nd
Leland Irving, 26th

2007
Kyle Turris, 3rd
Thomas Hickey, 4th
Karl Alzner, 5th
Sam Gagner, 6th
Brandon Sutter, 11th
Colton Gillies, 16th
Angelo Esposito, 20th

2008
Steven Stamkos, 1st
Drew Doughty, 2nd
Alex Pietrangelo, 4th
Luke Schenn, 5th
Cody Hodgson, 10th
Tyler Myers, 12th
Colton Teubert, 13th
Zach Boychuk, 14th
Chet Pickard, 18th
Jordan Eberle, 22nd
Tyler Ennis, 26th

United States - 30

2003
Ryan Suter, 7th

2004
Blake Wheeler, 5th
Al Montoya, 6th
Drew Stafford, 13th
Rob Schremp, 25th
Cory Schneider, 26th

2005
Bobby Ryan, 2nd
Jack Johnson, 3rd
Jack Skille, 7th
Brian Lee, 9th
T.J. Oshie, 24th
Matt Niskanen, 28th

2006
Erik Johnson, 1st
Phil Kessel, 5th
Kyle Okposo, 7th
Peter Mueller, 8th
Trevor Lewis, 17th
Mark Mitera, 19th
Bobby Sanguinetti, 21st
Chris Summers, 29th

2007
Patrick Kane, 1st
James vanRiemsdyk, 2nd
Ryan McDonagh, 12th
Kevin Shattenkirk, 14th
Ian Cole, 18th
Max Pacioretty, 22nd
Jonathan Blum, 23rd
Jim O'Brien, 29th

2008
Colin Wilson, 7th
Thomas McCollum, 30th

Czech Republic - 9

2004
Rostislav Olesz, 7th
Ladislav Smid, 9th
Marek Schwarz, 17th
Lukas Kaspar, 22nd

2005
Martin Hanzel, 17th
Jakub Kindl, 19th

2006
Michael Frolik, 10th
Jiri Tlusty, 13th

2007
Jakub Voracek, 7th

Russia - 7

2004
Alexander Ovechkin, 1st
Evgeni Malkin, 2nd
Alexander Radulov, 15th

2006
Semen Varlamov, 23rd

2007
Alexei Cherepanov, 17th

2008
Nikita Filatov, 6th
Viktor Tikhonov, 28th

Sweden - 7

2003
Robert Nilsson, 15th

2005
Nicklas Bergfors, 23rd

2006
Nicklas Backstrom, 4th
Patrik Berglund, 25th

2007
Mikael Backlund, 24th

2008
Erik Karlsson, 15th
Mattias Tedenby, 24th

Finland - 5

2004
Lauri Tukonen, 11th
Petteri Nokelainen, 16th
Lauri Korpikoski, 19th

2005
Tuukka Rask, 21st

2006
Riku Helenius, 15th

Slovakia - 4

2004
Boris Valabik, 10th
Andrej Meszaros, 23rd

2005
Marek Zagrapan, 13th
Vladimir Mihalik, 30th

Denmark - 2

2007
Lars Eller, 13th

2008
Mikkel Boedker, 8th


Belarus - 1

2003
Andrei Kostitsyn, 10th

Switzerland - 1

2008
Luca Sbisa, 19th

Of course, having players of great repute doesn’t guarantee success on the ice. And of course, Russia would surely have had more players chosen higher in the draft had the relations between the NHL and Russia not grown so frosty. Still, to have had three more first round picks play for us in the last five years than the Czechs, Russians, Swedes, and Slovaks combined and yet to have only one medal to show for it…I sound like a broken record.

Anyway, in thirty-three years of competing in the WJC, the US has won five medals. Five medals in thirty-three years.

Ron DeGregorio, Walter Bush, Jim Johannson, David Ogrean, Scott Sandelin, Walt Kyle, Ron Rolston, John Hynes, and whoever else who has or has had any power whatsoever at USA Hockey, I ask you...What the fuck?

#13

RBC Center – Carolina Hurricanes

Convenience/Access - Getting here from our hotel in Cary (W hy Cary? Good question) was easy. Without knowing much about the travel patterns in North Carolina, apparently it’s quite convenient.

Location/Scene - With few exceptions and allowances for instances where it isn’t feasible, we prefer rinks be located in a downtown/central/core area of a city. Even if that city is small or barely qualifies as one to us big city folk (see: NJ, TB, NAS, etc.). Carolina loses points here, as RBC is in the middle of a lot of nothing near the NC State campus. However it does redeem itself with excellent tailgaiting. Basically if the rink is in a damn parking lot, it had better have a tailgate scene. Carolina does, and we expected as much in the south.

Outside Appearance - Another in the line of large white ovals with moderate amounts of glass. It isn’t unattractive, but its certainly lower-tier as looks go.

Inner Aesthetics - The inner look of RBC elevates it to a ranking it would never get if we didn’t care so much about this category. The seats are all red. This looks cool. The setup of the seats is very simple yet effective and the luxury boxes are barely noticeable. It’s a bit worn and not a fancy-looking place, but we all liked it quite a bit.

Concourse - Your basic oval concourse. Lots of width and even with a sellout did not feel cramped at all. Beyond that it is very bland and even comes close to being that unforgivable trait, ‘sterile’.

Sightlines - Fantastic. We had among the worst seats in the house and felt close to the action. Good seat angles too.

Concessions - More blandness. We saw a few BBQ/sticky rib type kiosks, but little else to enhance the feeling of being in the South. American, macro-centric selection of beers.

Fans/Atmosphere - This was the first game we all hit up together in a “non-traditional” NHL market. It was also in the season the Canes went on to win the Cup. The atmosphere here was very, very boisterous. This place got LOUD, and at times in the game usually reserved only for crowds in Canada (i.e., times other than the Noise Meter, power plays, and goals.) For that alone, it gets high marks. Also cool: after goals a fan waves the flag of the home country of the goal scorer. Once the Cup Finals rolled around in ‘06, everyone got to see for themselves how awesome the atmosphere was. Granted that was a Cup final, but anywhere that can produce the noise level we experienced for a random game in March is ok by us. As for the actual hockey/overall acumen of the individual fans we encountered, well, that’s a different story.

History/Banners - The Hurricanes, due to legal squabbles, do not have any acknowledgement/link to their Hartford days on display. They also have (especially when we were there prior to their Cup win) very little history or success to acknowledge. So instead of doing what far too many other teams do and litter their rafters with cheap logo pennants of all 30 NHL teams, or worse, raise an inane banner commemorating “Fans #1”; Carolina had banners honoring the international success of its players- small tasteful banners with a player’s name and home country for the at the time upcoming Olympics (and presumably gone now). We liked this a lot. We also liked seeing Tom Gugliotta honored.

Cool Stuff - Besides those banners, there was a nice mural of the team’s first Cup run.

Bars - We stopped at one small but decent bar in the concourse. If there was much more, we didn’t see it.

Store - The Eye! Great name. Very small store but it had a very good selection.

Value - Probably better than average. Nothing seemed crazily priced, and the tickets were reasonable.

Overall – It’s pretty damn hard to write a long, interesting review about the RBC Center. Sorry. In short, we all had a very good time there and it probably beat expectations. But, paraphrasing EP, red seats will only get you so far.

#14

HSBC Arena - Buffalo Sabres

Convenience/Access – Central location and walkable from pretty much anywhere downtown. Getting a cab outside of the arena was not difficult.

Location/Scene – Its not exactly surrounded by things to do, but the walk to them isn’t long (or scenic).

Outside Appearance – A lot of the newer rinks look the same, and while HSBC may not be the most unique exterior around, it is still great looking. Big and imposing while not looking completely gargantuan or out of place.

Inner Aesthetics – This is a good time to divulge an important detail of our overall ratings. In general, the way the rink looks when you first walk into the seating bowl and take a glance around is the most important thing for us, combined of course with the look of it while you are sitting in your seat. It is why this rink (and others) is comparatively low despite being great in many other regards. HSBC in particular ranks very low on one of our lists (JP) specifically because of this (JP is the inner look czar). It’s unfortunate, and for some it may not be as important as, say, a gaping concourse with 20 microbrew bars. Anyway, the inner look of this rink is not great. The luxury boxes are pretty intrusive, it feels very open and cavernous inside, and the layout is boring and not especially appealing visually.

Concourse – Fantastic, massive, clean lobby upon entry. The concourse is one of the best, although also an example of a rink that makes their lower, primary concourse a thing of excellence and then skimps on the fans who use the one up top. The good one is slightly asymmetric and has plenty of room and stuff to see. The upper one has a bunch of carts selling Canadian beer and gets muddled with bathroom lines.

Sightlines – We have made visits to this rink and sat in good seats, which had great views. The views from the worst seats is not good, and not comfortable.

Bathrooms – Clean, but there were some long lines and a lot of loitering going on in there.

Concessions – Not as cheap as we’d have liked, but outstanding selection and JP still drools over the beef on weck consumed here. In general this is an underrated food city, and this rink does Buffalo proud.

Fans/Atmosphere – Sadly for a city and an area known for awesome people, there was a high jackoff quotient experienced on multiple trips here. A bunch of college kids sitting in cheap seats makes for a good atmosphere…sort of. It also can be really annoying when said college kids are non-hockey savvy d-bags. We have to be fair here. We know that Buffalo fans are legit and there's a good vibe in this rink. It just so happens that on our trips here, the overall experience wasn’t optimal. The inverse of this will show up later in other rinks.

History/Banners – Terrific French Connection banner. That’s pretty much it. Sporadic at best in the displays of tradition and history, and then of course there is the blatant ignoring of most fans’ wishes with respect to their logo and jersey.

Cool Stuff – The Buffalo Sports Hall of Fame greets you when you enter, and has a lot of interesting items to check out. Beyond that there isn’t that much to stand out in our memory.

Store – The best store in the league so far, without any close competition. Big, with everything you might want, and an absolutely awesome and unparalleled selection of ready-made jerseys of all styles. God damn shame about that new logo though.

Value – For a team that uses one of those stupid tiered-pricing structures based on date/opponent, forty bucks for horrible seats against Florida really cant be considered good value. Concessions/store/etc. were average, although for WNY some may consider them overpriced.

Overall – One of a small group of rinks where one of our ranks probably alters its consensus rating. It would be a spot or 3 higher under different circumstances. But this is a 3 man crew, and we’d all agree that while this is a very nice, attractive, and totally acceptable rink, it definitely doesn’t threaten the upper-crust of our hierarchy.

Random - Wonder what Olli Jokinen's agent/handler/hanger-on is up to these days.

#15

Tampa Bay Lightning - St. Pete Times Forum

Location/Scene – None of us can really be considered fans of central * Florida, but the location is fine, right in “downtown” Tampa. The usual nice weather means there are probably always a good amount of people hanging around the rink. There were a few exhibits/stands set up around the entrance. More importantly, across the street is Andreychuk’s, which is possibly the best hockey/pregame bar we’ve been to yet. Nice time there.

Outside Appearance – This place is massive looking from the outside. Tons of clean lines and glass make it a very appealing exterior. Simple, but very attractive.

Inner Aesthetics – One of the easiest ways to please us in terms of the seating bowl of a rink is to make the damn seats match the arena and team colors. This is especially true if the hockey team is the lone/major tenant. SPTF gets this right; the seats look great and make an otherwise cavernous and boring interior look great. Still, the place is giant and you definitely feel like you’re a mile from the ice when you’re up top. The rest of the layout is nice, as is the scoreboard.

Concourse – Bland. Another instance where if we’d come here just having experienced NVMC and MSG in our lives, this would be a palace. But there isn’t much to distinguish it, give it a local flair, or attract your attention. Strangely, the font used on the exterior section markers is tiny and hard to read.

Sightlines – Very good for a big rink, which usually means very vertical. We had pretty poor seats and yet the view was as good as a lot of other, smaller rinks. A good hockey-watching venue

Bathrooms – The only thing worth a comment is that there were a ton of them. Has to be a good thing, right?

Concessions – Good quality, selection, and price; but poor in terms of interesting or unique items.

Fans/Atmosphere – Quite good, as is usually described. The building gets quite loud and the fans don’t need stupid prodding to get into the game. Not afraid to voice their displeasure (appropriately) either. Yet another in what will be a trend of very, very good crowds and savvy fans in non-traditional areas.

History/Banners - The banners are absolutely awesome. Beyond that there is very little honoring their history. Obviously, they were bad for so long but they had some players the fans liked. Brian Bradley, Darren Puppa, John Cullen. Put freaking pictures of them up or something. Represent.

Cool Stuff – Not much, which is made worse by the fact that there’s plenty of room for it here. Probably two times more interesting stuff outside of the building than in it.

Bars – Actually quite a few places to get cocktails, which is great for us. A few larger spots with seating.

Store – Another rink with a lot of stands cluttering up the concourse that offer a whole lot of nothing. Between the two visits we can’t remember anything cool or worth buying (again- that is saying something for this group). CC remains appalled at the lack of player t-shirts here. Note to NHL teams: after you load up on pink jerseys and rally monkeys and 70 dollar hoodies, go ahead and stock some non-superstar name and number shirts. We will buy them.

Value – The upper tickets were very cheap. Probably a big reason they draw so consistently well. Nothing else stood out as crazy one way or the other.

Overall – Can’t put it much better than CC did after his 2nd (solo) visit here: Positives include the awesome blue seats, a nice scoreboard, pretty solid fans, reasonable tickets and food, plentiful bathrooms, good sightlines (though it is massive), and the great pavilion out front highlighted by the lightning bolts. On the negative side the place is pretty bland. Absolutely no bells and whistles. Not one food item that approaches unique. Their hallways are boring. A middle of the pack building as it is now.

* The state of

#16

Phillips Arena - Atlanta Thrashers

Convenience/Access - Its right in downtown Atlanta (whatever the hell that even means) and easy to walk to from much of the city. There was plenty of parking, including a massive garage that we mistook for the rink for about 5 minutes.

Location/Scene - Inside the CNN center which is basically a fancy mall. There wasn't much of a scene but there were a lot of people milling around.

Outside Appearance - Very nice. Lots of windows and a cool "Atlanta" sculpture on the front. The outside look sort of masks how giant this building is inside.

Inner Aesthetics - One of the only real unique layouts in the league here- all of the luxury boxes and club seats are stacked on one side of the ice. They themselves look nice, but overall this gives the whole inside an odd look when you're sitting across from them. The look of the seating bowl and seats themselves is decidedly average. Light blue dividers between glass panes is nice. Gray steel steps and barriers visible everywhere is not.

Concourse - Probably the biggest concourse we've ever seen in an indoor stadium. Big enough to have a nice, multi-story lobby in the front. Big enough to have the old scoreboard from the Omni (sweet) sitting there and not look overly big. There is a ton going on out here- stores, food, non-sports shops, a million televisions, and nooks and areas that seem like they've never been discovered. There is no denying that it's a really nice concourse but we all agree that the overall impression becomes a bit too much. Also, on the upper level, due to the aforementioned layout of the luxury boxes, you cant make a 360 degree lap around the arena. This is a major, major ding to us.

Sightlines - The upper seats are pretty far away. Once more, nothing of note to report here.

Bathrooms - Big and clean. They were definitely used thoroughly by at least 2 of us.

Concessions - Everything you could possibly want, it really does remind you of a mall food court. Quality was good.

Fans/Atmosphere - We aren't going to pile on Atlanta here. They have had it really rough. But even with Philly (and a lot of their fans) in town, there was nothing in the atmosphere here to warrant a positive or even condescendingly upbeat comment.

History/Banners - The Thrashers have no history, but the Hawks banners were awesome.

Cool Stuff - Let's see. There's the aforementioned scoreboard. Tons of TVs with other games from around the league on (something we haven't seen enough of across the trip). Two bird head type structures dangle from the ceiling and spew fire whenever the Thrash do something good like score (or, presumably, win). But its unlikely anything will ever approach the cool factor of stumbling (literally) into a random (and giant) room somewhere just off the concourse to find boxes of Hawks promotional items. It's generous to count this in the arena's overall favor, but damn right we are going to.

Bars - There were certainly tons of them, but we were too busy combing the bowels of this mega-concourse to be distracted by them.

Store - The store here is excellent and had the largest amount of off-the-rack player customized jerseys we've seen outside of Buffalo. This store spawned the most absurd impulse purchases of the trip when Justin and Mike simply could not resist 40 dollar Hawks jerseys. There are multiple stands where you can bring a jersey and get it professionally stitched right there.

Value - We paid well under 40 dollars to see an NHL game and an NBA game in a nice building in a span of 18 hours. Win.

Overall - Here is where we start to see the difficulty in ranking these places. Phillips is a sweet building. It is has a lot of quirks and is clean and easy to get to. But as a place to watch a hockey game, we all agreed that it is overwhelmingly bland. Juxtaposing those 2 things is hard to explain, but you'll have to trust us.

#17

Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum - New York Islanders

So yeah, the write up here will be much longer than usual, since this is one of our "home" rinks. Between the three of us we have seen more NHL games here than anywhere else. That's unfortunate, but really no better base to get an appreciation for what else is out there. Listen, the Coliseum sucks. Really, really hard. It's bad for visiting players, bad for the home team, bad for fans. Yes, its old-school and no frills. Yes, it has the best sightlines anywhere in the league- too bad this simply affords one a superlative view of Andy Hilbert. But there are places that give you these things and still act as viable locations for professional sporting events. The Isles need a new facility to survive as a franchise, plain and simple.

Convenience/Access - There are two ways to assess this category for the NVMC. If you live on Long Island, then you likely own a car (or three) and are used to ridiculous traffic and giant parking lots. The location of the rink is fine and relatively central population-wise. The other way of looking at it is that there is next to no way to get here via public transport if you don't live on the Island, are coming from out of town, cant drive, or would like to imbibe heavily while watching Freddy Meyer and Chris Campoli. A shuttle service from the nearest LIRR stations would do wonders here. Note that nearest does not mean close. In the end its probably unlikely that the location of NVMC keeps that many people away, but it for damn sure doesn't bring anybody, either.

Location/Scene - The only things within legitimate walking distance of NVMC are a Marriott (where many opposing teams no longer even stay) and a few delis/pizza joints across a 6 lane highway. Not so sweet. There is some proper tailgating on weekend games.

Outside Appearance - It's a big white dish in the middle of a parking lot. There are no windows. It isn't attractive, but it does scream 'hockey rink'. It would scream 'hockey rink' even more if there wasn't an equal-to-the NYI-one-sized New York Dragons (that's the Arena Football League, folks) banner draped hideously across the front. We're All Islanders. Or Dragons.

Inner Aesthetics - This place looks great largely because you can see all of it so easily. It is small, and it feels small. The seats are close to the ice, and there isn't much wasted space (except for a wide walkway behind each net). You really do feel like you could pick out someone sitting at the other corner of the rink, or in one of the luxury boxes. When half the building isn't empty, it looks even better. The seats/interior are slightly drab looking, but not enough to be a negative. The scoreboard, after a much-maligned absence and reemergence a decade ago, is small and basic but plenty adequate for such a small rink.

Concourse - Word up to Mellon Arena, which has given us new perspective on how poor a concourse can be. We now know that NVMC sports only the second-worst concourse in hockey. The floors are nasty and hideously tiled, it gets crowded due to the lines for the bathrooms which snake along the length of 3 gates, and there is absolutely nothing to do or see except possibly sign up for Newsday and ruin your credit rating. Ask Eric.

Sightlines - This is an outstanding rink to watch a hockey game in, possibly the best in the league. While it wouldn't be 100% accurate to say that there isn't a bad seat in the house, (some back row seats have really bad views under a low overhang) its damn close. The upper sections are closer to the ice than anywhere we've seen. The front rows of the upper tier and back rows of the lower tier are probably the best vantage points for a hockey game in the NHL. The sightlines here are phenomenal and you can feel the game from anywhere in the rink.

Bathrooms - Oh, the coliseum bathrooms. The stuff of lore. At 6:30 on a weeknight, during warm-ups, even with < style="font-style: italic;">
Concessions - Nothing interesting or really worth getting. There are more than enough stands though.

Comfort - The seats have above-average comfort, but with below-average legroom. It is consistently very, very cold in this rink.

Fans/Atmosphere - Everything that's written about the Coliseum atmosphere on a big playoff night is true- the place is loud and awesome. The low ceilings and tiny seating bowl equate to a lot of noise. But let's not kid ourselves- most people who just come to LI to see one game here will leave thinking that this is nothing short of a brutal, mid-tier ECHL team atmosphere, if for no other reason than that the Islanders rarely draw more than 12k, and put on the most heinous, insulting-to-fans game presentation of any major sports team in history. That is not an exaggeration. Buzz during NYI-NYR games is fantastic.

History - On one hand, the Isles bleed every possible event they can out of their 4 year glory run. There are alumni appearances/'nights' pretty much every season, as well as anniversary tributes and special appearances designed to get fans in the rink. They are always done with class (amazing for the Isles) but are way too frequent and have thus lost much of their cache. There are a lot of nice pictures around the concourse windows of past players, but no plaques or other informative displays. Of course, a large portion of the Islanders' history has no business being displayed. As for banners, NVMC should get a high score here, as the Isles have tons of players and accomplishments to celebrate. However, it took until very recently for management to see fit to clean any of the white banners, which were visibly soiled and had looked atrocious. They are also hung haphazardly and the font on the retired player banners is not consistent. More bush league, easily fixable stuff from the Isles here that goes from odd to completely infuriating once you've been to enough games.

Cool Stuff - There is absolutely nothing cool or interesting or interesting to see in this arena.

Bars - There is one on the lower level. It's always crowded and we've never hung out there. Last year they put a few tents outside and have tables and beer stands set up, which is a good start and sort of expands the concourse.

Store - Scattered booths around the concourse offer the usual stuff, all very expensive. There is actually a pretty good selection of player t-shirts, which is vital to us. You can buy NY lottery tickets here.

Value - Very overpriced tickets, which leads to a vicious cycle of poor attendance and ownership having to keep prices up to compensate. The 10 dollar walkup tickets are a good initiative which should be extended.

Overall - The Coliseum is a dump, and has been for some time. Its sole selling point- tiny size and terrific view- gets swallowed up among a litany of negatives. Justin‚s hockey credentials have been impeccably hardened here- watching one of the worst team in the league in one of the worse structures in the sport. We love it, and yet, we hate it.

Random - This will always be a funny sidenote in our chronicles- we all attended this rink together in 1997, a solid 8 years before the genesis of this quest. We sat in 3 different places and it was totally unknown at the time. We were (separately) with some of the other jabronis who we would, a decade later, drag along (or try to) on future trips. It was also a hilarious 3-3 tie with STL, the team which Eric would later become a full STH of, and featured one of the most Coliseum-defining moments ever (the re-unveiling of a new, slightly-less-crappy scoreboard- complete with black drape and spotlight). Feeling that this experience wasn't enough, we ventured back there together for a mid-year NYI-NJ contest which had all the potential in the world of being one of the least interesting games in NHL history- and somehow wound up being an awesome and entertaining game with a boisterous crowd.

2010 Olympic teams

My first post in quite a while. Here are my picks for Team USA and Team Canada for the 2010 Olympics.

Team USA

Head Coach: Peter Laviolette
Assistant Coach: John Tortorella
Captain: Chris Drury
Assistant Captains: Mike Komisarek and Zach Parise

Patrick Kane-Paul Stastny-Dustin Brown
Zach Parise-Scott Gomez-Phil Kessel
Patrick O'Sullivan-Chris Drury-Brian Rolston
Erik Cole-Brandon Dubinsky-Joe Pavelski

extra forwards; Jason Pominville and Peter Mueller

Brooks Orpik-Brian Rafalski
Ryan Suter-Mike Komisarek
Ryan Whitney-Erik Johnson

extra defenseman: Jack Johnson

Ryan Miller
Rick DiPietro

extra goalie: Tim Thomas

It's remarkable how much more depth we have compared to 2006. Assuming our up and coming young players develop the necessary leadership skills, USA Hockey should be fine for a while. We've got as much or more talent than we did in 1996 when we won the World Cup and in 2002 when we almost made away with a gold in Salt Lake City. This team was very hard to pick. Just 4 years ago at the World Cup we had the likes of Steve Konowalchuk, Ken Klee, and Jeff Halpern suiting up for us. All solid citizens, but basically third liner/third pair types. (Sorry Powers, not picking on ex-Caps). We've got a lot more to choose from now.

The same old problem persists though. We don't bring the consistent level of urgency to tournaments that other bring. We want to win but we'll never have the pressure of the other hockey playing powers. If Sweden or Finland are in a gold medal game, their countries shut down to watch it. Same in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. I wouldn't be surprised to learn of heads literally rolling in Russia if their team ended a tournament with a loss. Canada is Canada. They have to win.

Team Canada

Head Coach: Mike Babcock
Assistant Coach: Lindy Ruff
Captain: Sidney Crosby
Assistant Captains: Jarome Iginla and Chris Pronger

Rick Nash-Sidney Crosby-Jarome Iginla
Martin St.Louis-Vinny Lecavalier-Dany Heatley
Mike Richards-Jonathon Toews-Shane Doan
Eric Staal-Jordan Staal-Ryan Getzlaf

extra Forwards: Jason Spezza and Joe Thornton

Chris Pronger-Brent Burns
Dion Phaneuf-Shea Weber
Brian Campbell-Mike Green

extra defenseman: Dan Boyle

Martin Brodeur
Roberto Luongo

extra goalie: Marc-Andre Fleury

Canada's teams are always disgustingly good, but this one seems more so. Not since Steve Yzerman was getting snubbed for Canada Cup teams has someone with as much skill as Joe Thornton or Jason Spezza not gotten the call of duty. Poitras convinced me that Crosby would be a better captain than Iginla. This trio of captains will stare a hole through your soul if you fail to pick up your man. As long as the pressure their country puts on them doesn't unravel them it's hard to see them not at least making the gold medal game.

#18

Mellon Arena - Pittsburgh Penguins

Convenience/Access - It isn't hard to get to and its in Pittsburgh proper. There are probably few to no people who walk here, though. Its not in a crowded area.

Location/Scene - The only thing that seemed remotely walkable was the hotel down the street. Hop in your car (perhaps a Mercedes truck) if you want a postgame scene.

Outside Appearance - It's a big white dish in the middle of a parking lot. Aah, the parallels with Nassau continue. (they aren't done). After some debate, we all agreed that this place is actually quite cool looking. The roof is definitely unique and doesn't look so bad from the outside. The outside of the structure is nice.

Inner Aesthetics - The roof is a goddamned bubble! It is Idaho-level white and looks completely jarring, especially with giant ads plastered brutally all over it and scaffolding hanging down. The seating bowl is unique looking and hard to describe. It certainly isn't the oval/igloo shape you might expect. The seats are all red, except for the club seats, which are black. This would look good if the Devils played here. The scoreboard and signage are sub-par.

Concourse - It isn't common for the three of us to completely agree on something rink-related, much less use the same adjectives and superlatives when describing it. Yes if each of us had to summarize the Mellon concourse, it is a five-star lock that we would all use the following three words in some order: hazard, brutal, fire. There is nothing much to see or do other than pray for a swift return to your seat, or out of the building.

Sightlines - We expected better. They aren't bad of course, but for an old, smallish rink they certainly aren't outstanding. We have no idea what the view is like from the upper seats behind the nets that basically touch the roof as it slopes inward.

Bathrooms - Unacceptable. First you have to navigate there, and then you have to handle them. Just hold it.

Concessions - Apparently all of the decent sporting event food in this city is at PNC. Expensive too. Iron City beer gets 2 out of three thumbs down.

Fans/Atmosphere - Thanks to a great young team, Pitt has gone from almost being relocated to Waterloo to being a tough ticket and an obnoxiously popular team. When we went the fans were loud but there was a high asshole contingent behind us. Its worth noting that besides that, every single encounter all three of us have ever had with Pittsburgh people is overwhelmingly positive. Some great folk in western PA.

History/Banners - Tons of great success in this place's past, but like on Long Island, you can't really feel it just being here. Its got the banners and such but you're not swimming in it (which we thing you should be) like in many other rinks.

Cool Stuff - We think we remember some table hockey games set up somewhere.

Bars - nah.

Store - The main store seemed decent, but the smaller kiosks were way too expensive and boring. This is one of the rare arenas where none of made an impulsive souvenir buy.

Value - Our tickets were very expensive for the quality, as was just about everything else. Apparently there are good student programs here.

Overall - We all like Pittsburgh a lot as a city. We all like the Igloo. It‚s just old and decrepit and needs replacing- and unlike with the Islanders, it will be soon. PNC Park is off-the-charts awesome, and Heinz is always rated highly as well. Consider also that Pit is one of the few NHL teams making money, and there are plenty of reasons to expect the new arena will be boss. But for now, the fact that it's a hilarious bubble and has a cool nickname does not cover up its warts, making it our choice (albeit a contentious one) for worst of the rinks so far.

Random - For lack of anything else better nearby to do, we hung around in the parking lot after the game on a really fucking cold night. Doing so provided us with humor and pictures that still stands out among trip moments.

USA 2010, take 1

Vancouver 2010 Team USA, by Justin.

Coach: Peter Laviolette

Alternate Captains: Mike Komisarek, Dustin Brown

Captain: Chris Drury.

Drury isnt the first guy who leapt out at me. I could certainly make a damn good lineup without his name in it. But this is the right player. By 2010, one of two things is likely to have happened, and USA-wise, it's a win-win for his role as Captain. 2 years from now Perhaps Chris Drury has led the Rangers to a Cup Final, or even a Cup. He will be revered in New york and in hockey circles to the point of nausea. Vancouver will give him the chance to cement his status as Legend, and you have to believe he will be raring to go. Or, NYR will have been stuck in neutral and maybe he will have struggled as Captain with the rumblings that he isnt vocal enough, that he's overpaid, that he has largely failed as "the guy" in a tough market. The pressure will have gotten pretty high. Doubts creeping in. Here, he can forget that weight and focus entirely on the Olympics as a fresh slate. He gets a team with (like NYR) a good mix of young and old guys, some teammates he is already comfortable with, and he can really step up and take the team into a hostile environment. He doesn't have to be a big scorer. He doesn't have to be a shutdown
player. He doesn't even have to play center. He just has to be a calm leader who has been in these spots before and can get some of these guys fired up for the opportunity. This may be more thought than necessary for a 5 game tournament's Captain. But it shouldn't be an afterthought.


Goalies:

Ryan Miller, Rick DiPietro
- Miller starts. I along with all Isles fans hoped that by 2010 DP would have taken this mantle and run with it. It doesn't look good. So its Miller Time.


Defence:

This wasn't as hard as I thought. There isnt room for sorta-good offensively, nondescript defensively guys on here. If you're an elite offensive threat, great. If not, you need to be able to move and possibly scramble for a long shift in your own end; move the puck quick and well; and most importantly have the ability/desire to break an NHL teammate's wrist in the corners with no hesitation in the course of a gold.

Brian Rafalski - Mike Komisarek
- I'm not too concerned about 2 lefties. This is a no-brainer top pairing. Both are used to playing with a partner very similar to the one they have here- Komi knows how to cover for a guy who likes to rush and might get beat in the corners once in awhile. He's also a fucking beast. Rafalski can be really nondescript at times, but when part of a good team playing well, he becomes elite.

Keith Ballard - Jack Johnson
- Johnson is very suspect at this point. This is a lot of pressure to put on him. Well, all the better chance for him to step up and make party. There aren't many guys in the USA stable that I think would relish being public enemy #1 in a Canadian city at the olympics. JJ probably never saw or used a microscope at UM, but his play and his demeanor will be under a really fucking big one here. Do it. Ballard is steady as hell.

Erik Johnson - Ryan Suter
- If I'm being optimistic, I can hope that by 2010 this pair can rival almost any in the olympics. EJ missing '08 made him incredibly hard to put on here. But you have to be able to play rugged defence, and you have to be able to make a difference out there. Will he make more mistakes than Paul Martin might? Yeah, but he has 100x more upside too and is a potential game-breaker.


Forwards:

Now THIS was hard. But this is the lineup that would ideally play in every game. I copped out and named 2 extra F, but they are basically just token guys for the room. The 4 lines roll this way, no substitutions. COMPETE.

Dustin Brown - Paul Stastny - Patrick O'Sullivan
- I love this line. Awesome hockey smarts all around. Since the first 2 lines are definitley 1 and 1A, I didn't see any reason to split DB and POS. This puts a lot of faith in Stastny to be the guy to elevate this line to elite.

Zach Parise - Scott Gomez - Pat Kane
- Listen up Scotty: Every other line on this team has pretty good defensive players on it. It would have been easy to make sure you line up with some bruisers and backcheckers so you can focus on dishing. No. You were unknown in the purgatory of NJ, now you're a guy who chased the money and is happy being a good player on a good team. Enough- this is your time to be a superstar. You know Parise's game. He and PKane are not here to cover their wingers. Time to prove you can be a devastatingly effective setup guy and use your speed on the big rink to still cover them up defensively. Show it. Kane and Parise- light it up. No excuses. This must be a consistently effective offensive line or USA sinks.

Phil Kessel - Ryan Kesler - Jason Pominville
- Spend any time getting caught up with Kesler, or chasing Phil around while he flies all over, and Pominville will quietly blaze you, like he always does. This can be a really effective line in a lot of different ways. Speed, hands, grit, assholeness and all three of these guys should and will have a nice chip on their shoulders and be salivating to make their mark on a USA team in Vancouver.

Chris Drury - Peter Mueller - Brandon Dubinsky
- So much to work with here. Initally the 4th center spot had Dubinsky and David Booth penciled in with a speedy winger. But then there wasn't much that fit. There cant be a straight grinding line in this tournament. I'd rather a fast, responsible 4th line with wads of potential. Booth-Dubi-Pavelski sounds wonderful, but to be fair it would probably get fucking devoured.

Extras: Chris Higgins, Erik Cole. I'm sorry guys. 2 dependable, reliable scorers and workers passed over for playing time in favor of some shit-disturbers and young assassins. Enjoy the Salmon in B.C. though.

Landslide

The Curse Continues

The Curse of Palin

Did anyone notice how the economy burst right after Sarah Palin came onto the national scene? Or that the presidential race suddenly became a lot nastier when she was on board?

Well now two lucky teams get to deal with the Palin Curse: your very own Philadelphia Flyers and St. Louis Blues.


Let's look at the facts:

- After going to the conference finals last spring, the Flyers are STILL winless after six games played. Their goalies are letting anything in the net, as long as it's hard, black, and made of vulcanized rubber.

- To be fair, Philly has some major defensemen injuries. And they've played some tough teams: San Jose twice, the Penguins, the Rangers, and Montreal. But the big bad Flyers couldn't even get a win from Colorado, which, between the beaten-down Andrew Raycroft and the hapless Peter Budaj, is all but without a starting netminder. In fact, the Flyers got creamed that game, 5-2. Is this really the same team that completely shut down juggernaut Montreal in last year playoffs?

Needless to say, things are not looking good for the Flyers.

In the end, surely Sarah Palin brings some modicum of excitement to a game. Let's not forget, this is a hockey mom we're talking about here. But the real lesson is this: if I'm a team president or GM, and Palin's handlers call me asking if she can drop the puck, I'll tell her to scoot her butt to another rink. For all I care, she can go ask Oren Koules if Tampa is free. He's always up for a gimmick.

Why the Bubble Will Burst

A quick note on the Blues, who last night failed to come from behind against the Red Wings the way they had against the Leafs, Predators, and Blackhawks:

The bubble will burst. Oh yes it will. This team is good, especially on the power play, where they are first in the league. But here are some very telling statistics:

Paul Kariya, -1
Andy McDonald, -6
Brad Boyes, -5
Keith Tkachuk, -1
Eric Brewer, -4

That's only through six games - four of which the Blues won!

Once this power play stops functioning, which could happen anytime, the team is in trouble. Also, it's interesting to note that the team uses either four or five forwards on the power play, depending on whether forward Lee Stempniak is hurt. That's a good strategy, but teams will start picking up on it. I'd like to see them try that against the Penguins. My prediction: Jordan Staal will net two shorties.

For those of you looking for hope, it comes in the form of the youngsters, who look fantastic so far.

David Perron, 5 points in 6 games, +2
T.J. Oshie, 3 points in 6 games, +1
Patrick Berglund, 3 points in 5 games, +3

These kids are gonna be alright. And when they get Erik Johnson and Alex Pietrangelo back, they're gonna be more than alright. For now, though, don't expect the status quo to continue.

The Caps Have Arrived

The Caps look good tonight - VERY good. They're doing things I haven't seen them do before, even during last year's admittedly short-lived playoff run. Let's take a look at tonight's game versus Vancouver (currently 5-1 through two periods):

- Alex Semin looks for real. I've always said that he's one of the most talented players in the league, but that he lacked heart. Now it looks like he has a little of that, too.

- Mike Green has taken a clear step forward

- The Caps PP looks unstoppable.

- Remember, the Caps won the division and took the Flyers to seven games all without Nylander. And now he's back. He has a goal and two assists and is +2 so far tonight.

- Sergei Fedorov is playing defense!

- They chased Luongo - the goalie many picked to win the Vezina this year - after two periods. You're not MVP-worthy tonight, Robert.

- This has all happened with Ovechkin not making a mark on the score sheet.

The one question, obviously, is the goalie position. But if you can score 5 goals a game, maybe the tandem of JT60 and Brent Johnson won't be so bad after all.

To be sure, the Caps won't (can't) do this for 82 games. But damn if they don't look good. They're really firing on all cylinders. This could be a special season, folks.

Saturday Scraps

First, I'll bite on these, we haven't tackled arena stuff in awhile.


This year's visits: all hopeful- Detroit Red Wings, Toronto Maple Leafs, Minnesota Wild.

The stadiums I'm most excited to visit: The Joe, GM Place, HP Pavillion, Xcel.

Most overrated stadium: Overrated is a pretty impossible term to use, but I'll assume we mean overrated by those outside our travel group. In this case- Atlanta, which is always mentioned as kick-ass by visiting announcers and media. It's the kind of place that seemed sweet when it was the 5th rink we'd been to, and now offers up very little.

Most underrated stadium: I'll echo the Sommet Center. h/m SBP in Ottawa, which only improves in my head the longer its been, which is rare.

Stadium that doubles as a death trap: Uh, yeah, Mellon. Stampede.


Honorable mention: NVMC bathroom line during NYI/NYR.

One thing I'm especially proud of: Defacing property in multiple cities with our current arena count.

Also: Combing the bowels of Phillips for Josh Childress replica cutouts.

Most nondescript arena: St. Pete TF. Blah.

Something I've done that you havent: Seen an NHL game in all 4 time zones.

How many stadiums have you been to at least twice? Wow, 9 as well. I've got : NVMC, MSG, Bell/Molson, Prudential, Continental, Verizon, Scottrade, AAC, Wachovia.

Finally: With about a dozen to go, PHI remains the consensus pick for best arena.

One more thing

Of the stadiums I've been to, the ones I most want to re-visit are: San Jose, Boston, Pittsburgh, Columbus. In that order.

30-30

I've been to 21 hockey stadiums. 18 of these stadiums are currently still used for hockey. The stadiums I've been to, in order, are:

1. old Washington - Capital Centre/US Air Arena/US Airways Arena
2. old Philadelphia - The Spectrum
3. Washington - Verizon Center
4. Boston - TD Banknorth Garden (formerly Fleet Center)
5. NYI - Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum
6. old NJ - Brendan Byrne Arena/Continental Airlines Arena
7. Philadelphia Wachovia Center (formerly the FU Center, best-named stadium in all of sports)
8. NYR - Madison Square Garden
9. San Jose - HP Pavilion
10. Pittsburgh - Mellon Arena
11. Columbus - Nationwide Arena
12. Buffalo - HSBC Arena
13. Atlanta - Phillips Arena
14. Carolina - RBC Center
15. St Louis - Scottrade Center (formerly Savvis Center, Kiel Center)
16. Tampa - St. Pete Times Forum
17. Florida - BankAtlantic Center
18. Chicago - United Center
19. Dallas - American Airlines Center
20. Nashville - Sommet Center (formerly Gaylord Arena, worst named stadium in pro sports)
21. New Jersey - Prudential Center

This year's visits: Colorado Avalanche, Detroit Red Wings, Toronto Maple Leafs. Maybe Minnesota Wild.

The four stadiums I'm most excited to visit: Scotiabank Place in Ottawa, The Forum in Montreal, XCel Energy Center in Minneapolis, Pepsi Center in Denver.

Most overrated stadium: Scottrade Center. I hate to say this, but it's true. Compared to other arenas, this one is absolute garbage. But it does have a statute of Bernie Federko, and it has kept me sane during law school. So I cant hate on it too much.

Most underrated stadium: Sommet Center in Nashville. This place is FOR REAL. Great game entertainment, too.

Honorable mention: United Center in Chicago

Stadium that doubles as a death trap: Mellon Arena, going away.

Honorable mention: Phillips Arena

One thing I'm especially proud of: Ish, JP, and I have been to 14 of 18 existing stadiums together - including all of the last 12 new ones I've been to.

Something I've done that you havent: Gone to at least 40 games in three different stadiums (Capital Centre, Verizon Center, Scottrade Center)

Also: I know all the secrets of the Verizon Center.

How many stadiums have you been to at least twice? Nine. (Capital Centre, Verizon Center, Scottrade Center, The Spectrum, Wachovia, TD BankNorth, American Airlines Center, Nassau, MSG)

Finally. I'm almost two-thirds done. This has been a fun ride.

what what?

The Blues PP scores 4 goals, including two by Fat Keith?

The Isles start off the season with Joey MacDonald in net?

The supposedly "vaunted" Florida defense allows 6 goals?

Alex Ovechkin plays 23 minutes and registers no points?

Jose Theodore lets in 4 goals on the first 17 shots he faces as a Cap? (Who are we kidding, this was predictable)

This could be a long and unpredictable season. It will be fun (or scary) to look at the preseason picks in April.

Rookie Scoring Bet

This will never replace The Sheet, but why the hell not, let's document dumb wagers here as well. Maybe sending fewer enclosures back and forth will help close the Vortex.

Total points only. Prize is TEN DOLLARS. Oh yeah.

E
Kyle Turris
Jakub Voracek
Fabian Brunnstrom
Brandon Sutter
Mikkel Boedker
Drew Doughty
Alex Goligoski
Karl Alzner

J
Kyle Okposo
Derrick Brassard
Shawn Matthias
Teddy Purcell
Claude Giroux
Brian Lee
Anssi Salmela
Jonas Ahnelov

Commish for a Day

Michael Farber at SI.com contributes the ten changes he would make as NHL commissioner.

I concur with Farber on two of these (#s 1 and 2); the next eight are my own:

1. Mandatory visors. Ive been saying this for years- it is going to take a human eyeball rolling in a bloody mess on the ice for the NHL to wake up on this issue. No, they arent going to prevent all injuries. Irrelevant. This is a serious no-brainer, and the PA could file every grievance they like- but if I'm in charge, you can go play in the Quebec Senior leagues if you want to be a tough guy and not wear one. . Every single player entering the NHL right now has worn a visor (or more) their entire amateur career. There is no adjustment needed for them.

2. Schedule format changes. Everyone loves playing divisional rivals a lot. And I'm sure all the teams love the decrease in air travel. But its just not right that a hockey fan in Vancouver who shells out big bucks for tickets only gets to see Sidney Crosby once every three seasons. Or that If I have Isles tickets, I'd better hope Im around the one day every three years I can see Dion Phaneuf or Ladislav Nagy play in my hometown. Sorry fellas, you can deal with the air travel. Respect your fans and let them see all of the league. More specifics on this later.

3. Stiffer, more consistent suspensions. The suspensions the NHL doles out are nothing short of a farce. The biggest thing keeping hockey in the "dark ages" at times isnt fighting, isnt defensive schemes, and isnt baggy jerseys. Its having to try to defend your sport and explain to non-hockey fans why a guy can criminally assault someone on the ice and miss only a handful of games. Or why Jiri Fischer can deliberately, maliciously crosscheck someone in the face and miss one game. Or why players can kick, sucker-punch, hit from behind, and slash each other with little fear of meaningful punishment. There is always a need for a case-by-case review, but anything deemed intent to injure gets you 10 games minimum, unpaid, plus whatever Campbell's replacement adds on. Anyone from the PA who complains about hefty fines immediately has their name released to the media.

4. Eliminate a point for losing a game. Im not a fan of the shootout, but I applaud the league for bringing it in and it seems to be here to stay. Fine. But there is no reason that a team that loses a game in overtime should get a point. The major issue is that some games give out 3 points, and others 2. So someone watching a game between two teams his team is chasing must hope for a non-OT game. Further, rather than spicing up overtime (which 4-on-4 did all by itself), it has led to the occasional drab final 5 minutes of a game where teams take just as few risks as before. I'd rather watch a tenuous 4-4 OT than a tenuous 5-5 third period. The only solution is three points for a win. Forget the record book and the traditionalists. 3 points for a win, two for a shootout win. One point for a shootout loss. Its a bunch of columns, and it would take some getting used to, but its worth it. If the shootout stays, so should this system.

5. Tweaks to international tournaments. I'd take the pros out of the olympics. It was great hockey, and gave us some good memories, but I think its more hassle than it's worth. Keep the World Cup and hold it every three years. As the only major tournament using all eligible NHL players, it will take on intensified meaning for everyone and lead to an amazing showcase. Heres the important part though- play in friggin Europe, too. It is patently absurd that countries like Sweden or the Czech Republic, with the amount of succes they have had, should have to come over to N. America and win a tournament on hostile ice. Rotate the tournament between the 7 major contenders. I could even live with an alternating N. America/Eurpoe format. Then Canada could have its precious home-ice more often. Or, gasp, let the winner host the next one. This will give the tournaments continuity, up the ante for the respective national federations to ice winning teams ($$$), and just plain be more fair. Hey Canada and USA, congrats on your success over here. Great, your fan support is raucous and rabid (well, Canada anyway). Now try winning a big semifinal game in Stockholm or Prague. See if you arent amazed by the passion and intensity for "your" game over there.

6. White jerseys at home. Everyone is well aware that the league has gone back and forth on this issue over its history. Its time to go back. This is one more instance of little kicks at your average ticket-holder- blue (or whatever color your home team is) on white for 41 games gets pretty repetative. If the marketing wizards at the NHL somply cannot stand this, a simple solution is to do as the league did in its 75th anniversary season, and wear whites at home for the first half of the year, and dark at home for the second half.

7. Change the "Brian Campbell" rule and the goalie trapezoid. If a player shoots the puck out of the rink, its a faceoff deep in their zone, with no changes permitted. Simple, no discretion involved. Scrap the trapezoid. It didnt really have much effect on the game that I could notice. Seems kind of needless. Fewer rules are better than more.

8. Shorten the schedule. Another idea that simply makes too much sense. I dont care that the NBA has a similar schedule. There is way more wear in an NHL season. Despite the playoffs now only including half of the teams in the league, the regular season is still less meaningful than it should be. There is way too much attrition and passion in a typical hockey game for it to count as 1/82nd of your point total. Of course, the reason this doesnt happen is because it is a rare issue that the owners and PA agree on- they dont want it because it takes money out of their pockets. I say if they can suck up the financial hit they took in 2004-05, they can take this hit. Move to this format: 6 games vs your division (24) , 1 vs the other conference (15), 3 vs the other divisions in your conference (30). 69 game season. There are very powerful computers that can make nice, tidy, unbalanced schedules.

9. Change the way special teams' effectiveness is calculated. Currently, If a team is up a man for 9 seconds and doesnt score, they are 0-1 on the PP. Pretty silly, and leads to misleading percentages and ranks. The simple answer is to calculate goals scored per two minutes on the powerplay/penaly kill, similar to a pitcher's ERA. This would offer a much more realistic statistic regarding a team's PP and PK. Frankly, I'm not sure why this hasnt ever come up.

10. Add a "scudetto"-style patch. I doubt anyone reading this has ever heard of the Scudetto, but it is a small flag patch which goes on the jerseys of the Italian Serie A soccer league the season after their championship. After this initial season, they then usually then affix a star above the team crest, one for each title. After a team wins the cup, affix a little Stanley Cup patch on their jerseys for the next season. After that, add a star or some other annotation recognizing the franchise's championship history. Its a nice little touch, added recognition for champions, and in the current times of crazy player movement, its nice for fans to be able to identify with organizational success.